I took aim at an anti-equality site yesterday (because that’s really what being anti-feminism is) and I do so again today. This time the site is called ‘Feminism is Cancer‘. The site’s author (FIC, as I don’t know how else to address them) actually posted a comment on my previous article, and I made a few comments on a couple of his. Curiously (or perhaps not so curiously) my comments, and his replies to them, were deleted. Unfortunately I didn’t copy them down – a lesson learned there.
I ought to mention here that, regardless of how much I disagree with the stuff FIC has written, he has been prepared to put it out there.
So what does FIC have to say for himself?
When women stood up for the right to work and vote it had a meaning, what came after it has been disastrous.
The 1960’s was when “modern” feminism was born and all it has left in its path has been ruin and destruction. First order of chaos? The 50% divorce rate – and yeah, feminism is directly responsible for it. Men are biologically wired to be attracted to feminine women (women that act like ladies). Women are biologically wired to want masculine men.
FIC brought up the divorce rate idea both when he commented on this blog and when I was commenting on his. Needless to say, there are problems with this overly simplistic analysis. He doesn’t provide any proof, beyond ‘feminism!’ When pressed to proof a causal link between feminism and divorce rates, he not only fell silent but it was at that point the comment chain got deleted, and even if we assume he has a point, does it mean what he thinks it means?
If there’s a link between the growth of the feminism movement and divorce rates, why would such a link exist? Is it even remotely as simple as ‘feminism makes women reject men?’ Of course not – in fact that argument is complete rubbish. Instead what we may be looking at is the rejection of marriages that were in some way abusive, with women coming to realise the supposedly acceptable behaviour of their husbands wasn’t in fact, the least bit reasonable. The rejection of pre-determined roles in a marriage might also have been a factor. Finally, there may well be any number of social factors driving divorce rates that feminism has no or little influence on. FIC is making unsupported statements.
We’re also ‘hard-wired’ to be attracted to certain traits. The thing is, we’re not. We’re individuals with rich and varied tastes and ideas and we are all therefore attracted to different qualities. There may be a base truth to the idea that we’re all attracted to certain qualities, but this superficial and not the defining aspect of our relationships with the opposite sex.
Furthermore, this idea traps us into certain pre-defined roles. It traps both men and women into a system that becomes hard to challenge, no matter the harm it causes.
Since the 60’s media has feminized men and masculinized women. Women, more importantly “feminists” don’t even know this. They preach, but most are single and miserable for this very reason – their insides tell them they want a real man, but their belief system has them thinking they want a feminized beta male that doesn’t know how to check the oil in his car and spends more time in front of a mirror than she does.
Feminism has done no such thing. It has been – and still is – about equality. It is about freedom of choice and opportunity. It breaks down tired old definitions of what a ‘real man’ and ‘real woman’ really are. It doesn’t fall prey to the idea that we are defined purely by our genders, and must somehow live our lives accordingly.
Men are just as confused, they watch a modern bullshit rom-com produced and directed by a clueless liberal beta male and think that’s how they’re supposed to get the girl, by being more of a woman than she is. Over pursuing, treating her like a celebrity, showering her with compliments, stalking, treating dates like wedding anniversaries – and then they get angry when she picks the “bad boy” or “the asshole” instead because he’s the masculine one. The movies always leave that part out and if they do include it, he’s a wife beater, druggie or some other demon.
Oh no, men and women are opening up and being more individual in how they court each other! Men are not assuming every woman wants the same thing – they’re starting to see women as people, and women are no longer enamoured by the gruff, strong-yet-silent stereotype that harms the image of men as much as it helps (if it helps at all). There are men who are less afraid of their emotions, and women who appreciate that.
So what has this led to in 2016? Men and women that don’t understand each other, short term fabricated relationships based on looks alone that lead to failure, 50-60% divorce, n0body having kids anymore, 25+ year old millennial virgins that have less sex than their parents that live in said parents basement strapped with 75K in debt for a fake feminist directed degree that has no use.
Blah blah blah. Baseless claims, brought on by a backlash against a misunderstanding of what feminism is.
I know what you’re thinking – how in the hell are feminists responsible for the current college and university mess? Well, in the 60’s all of those hippies behind feminism couldn’t get regular jobs so they became teachers. Back when they went to school, taught by the greatest generation, even if it was for an art degree, you’d come out with legit skills – not anymore.
Not only have they systematically destroyed the education system, if you drop down to public school they are also fucking their students on an almost epidemic basis. Why? Because the 14 year old boy still runs on biological instinct, he hasn’t been brainwashed by feminism which pushes women away – what they do attracts women.
More baseless claims.
Not just online dating, but dating and relationships in general – but in this case I focus on the digital realm because just like everything else, feminism has destroyed it too.
Its actually the nuclear wasteland of modern feminism.
Millions of men and women that have been pitted against each other by 30-40 years of feminism, and don’t even know the first thing about understanding each other – sending messages back and forth through online meat markets nationwide.
Since feminism has told women to not chase men on their values, accomplishments and merit – it’s become purely a picture and physical attraction game.
This is why the 5’2″ smurf chick demands a guy no shorter than 5’10”, but smurf hasn’t thought about her potential son being blessed with her short gene and being shunned all the same, it’s all about her! I say potential son in the odd case she gets knocked up and keeps it – her “career” of scheduling meetings is far too important to disrupt by having a child.
Erm, hang on, in his earlier post FIC was saying that women secretly want a masculine, manly man, and feminism is undermining this. Now he’s saying it’s all about physical attraction and not about who the man really is.
The dismissal of women who actually want to have a life beyond being a parent just underscores the total misunderstanding FIC has of feminism and women in general
(He posts a picture now of a woman performing oral sex on a man, with the tagline ‘how it used to be’. I won’t reproduce that picture here, but this speaks volumes to the objectification of women FIC actually desires)
Men can’t get by on looks alone either! Nope, that first message you send her better be Hunter S Thompson quality or you can fuck off!
Ok, ok – so you’re a good looking guy that has the ability to intrigue with words – good. Now you can get dates, but you aren’t out of the woods yet. Online date sites are filled with angry, clueless and miserable feminists that ultimately hate men and they “don’t even know why” they signed up. As I posted before, their insides crave masculinity, but their belief system has an agenda here.
Women, no matter how hard they try are still extremely emotional beings that will cry if it rains out or the wind blows the wrong way, so many delete their accounts when a guy stops responding or doesn’t call her again after one date – too much to handle! But the hundreds of messages, likes and winks from others can keep most going by inflating their ego, as well as their standards in the process.
It’s a good thing that we can’t get by purely on looks! It’s a good thing that we should be expected to demonstrate we can hold intelligent and meaningful conversations with someone we might be looking to share our lives with! Men will send unsolicited dick pics to women on dating sites, Facebook and Twitter, and then wonder why their bravado is not rewarded. Guess what? Women value men who can use words that are more than two syllables long.
His final paragraph suggests to me FIC is blowing hot air. I can only wonder as to what role his own experiences with women have led him to reach his conclusions.
Taken from the comments section of this post:
Women are not leaders – they fail and cause a huge mess when handed control. Look at Germany or beta males that “lead” other western countries. Too emotional and easily swayed. ALPHA MEN need to stand up and re-take control – you are seeing this right now with Trump. Last stop to bring back order and control to this feminist madness.
Since Germany is actually one of the best-performing economies in Europe right now, I have to wonder by what definition FIC is judging the success of a nation. FICs support from Trump… well, that says it all.