Following from the excellent posts by Rae and Carla (I urge you to check them out), I wanted to add my own thoughts on the racial problems that continue to exist in the US, decades after the efforts of Dr Martin Luther King and so many other brave souls.

Sometimes the problem is subtle and insidious. It can found in the stereotyping of black people – the assumptions about their mannerisms, speech, style and behaviour. Sometimes it’s more overt – with the active denial of rights and displays of outright hatred. Regardless of how it happens, it’s wrong.

Nor is it a US problem, though the issue of how black people get treated in America has been making headline news once again, following yet another act of police recklessness. The death of Philando Castile follows from the shooting of Alton Sterling a couple of days ago, and both of these tragix events follow the same narrative – an overreaction from the police, using violence as a first resort and not pausing to consider any other option.

The police officer who shot Mr Castile appears to have done so because Mr Castile reached for his driving licence when the officer asked him to – so what prompted the officer to suddenly open fire? Mr Castile had informed the officer that he was licenced to carry a firearm and that he was doing so – so it’s not like the officer suddenly discovered a weapon. Try as I might, I can’t see any reason for the officer to shoot, unless he was making jittery assumptions about Mr Castile, based solely upon the fact he was black.

What’s worse, the officers involved in these incidents do not usually face charges, or if they do, they are treated as internal police matters, rather than matters of public law. Had the officer in fact been a regular guy who over-reacted and opened fire, they might face murder charges – yet the police are treated differently.

It’s hard for me to fully understand everything that’s going on here. I’m not black, I’m not a police officer and I’m not American. Britain is not without racial crime, but it seems to be of a different nature to what happens in the US (nevertheless, it needs opposing here as much as it does over there).

What needs to happen, first and foremost, is for police officers (and indeed, anyone in authority) who abuse their power to be held to account for it – properly, before their peers, rather than via the protection of other officers.

4 thoughts on “Racism

  1. You have to follow the white rabbit down the rabbit hole, and use what I’d call philosophy here. First, you are not dealing with individual police officers, you are dealing with an utterly corrupt system from the top down, and what is happening is, the “top” needs to keep its “protectors” feeling special and also protected from prosecution so they’ll always be there when the top echelon needs them to attack “the rabble” when it wakes up. These “random” killings are designed to send a message to the American police by the top echelon that does not prosecute: stick with US and we’ll protect you from due process, and when push comes to shove, we’ll make sure you get special treatment, and all the arms and ammo you need to protect US and yourselves from the mobs. Take it to the top: the Chilcot report declares Tony Blair is a war criminal – but he’s not going to be prosecuted despite all the evidence. In the US, there’s Hillary Clinton who gets immunity from the FBI despite being basically branded a traitor to her own country – so she can continue to run for president. Corruption anyone? See any problem here? To focus on low echelon individual acts of “random” violence by authority (and authoritarian) figures is to blind oneself to the big picture. It’s understandable though, the “big picture” is quite indigestible for people brainwashed in thinking they live in a democracy, and under the rule of just law. So, your problem isn’t individual illegal violence, it’s top-down corruption.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. You’re entirely correct. Police officers cannot get away with this sort of thing, over and over, without some sort of support and collusion. It’s the same sort of thing that protects the Stanford rapist whilst people of colour have the book thrown at them. The Coalition aims to challenge this.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.